#Motion to dismiss defimation dc full
#Motion to dismiss defimation dc plus

We remain committed to defending against this baseless lawsuit and its all-out assault on the First Amendment.”įox News had sought to have the lawsuit dismissed arguing that its coverage is protected by the First Amendment and that a free press must be able to report both sides of a story involving claims that strike at the core of democracy.

#Motion to dismiss defimation dc full

the Complaint’s allegations support the reasonable inference that Fox intended to keep Dominion’s side of the story out of the narrative.'įox News Media said in a statement that “As we have maintained, Fox News, along with every single news organization across the country, vigorously covered the breaking news surrounding the unprecedented 2020 election, providing full context of every story with in-depth reporting and clear-cut analysis. Steele and Orbis filed a pecial motion to dismisss the defamation complaint pursuant to 16- 5502 of the Anti- SLAPP Act. 'Given that Fox apparently refused to report contrary evidence. The judge also wrote that despite emails from Dominion attempting to factually address Fox's fraud allegations, Fox and its news personnel continued to report Dominion's 'purported connection to the election fraud claims without also reporting on Dominion’s emails.' The fact that, despite this evidence, Fox continued to publish its allegations against Dominion, suggests Fox knew the allegations were probably false.' In denying the motion to dismiss the lawsuit Davis said that Dominion's complaint “supports the reasonable inference that Fox either (i) knew its statements about Dominion’s role in election fraud were false or (ii) had a high degree of awareness that the statements were false.”ĭavis said that 'Fox possessed countervailing evidence of election fraud from the Department of Justice, election experts, and Dominion at the time it had been making its statements. Federal Judge Beryl Howell just DENIED Rudy Giuliani s Motion to Dismiss the Defamation claims by Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss. An Associated Press review of every potential case of voter fraud in the six battleground states disputed by former President Donald Trump has found fewer than 475 - a number that would have made no difference in the 2020 presidential election.

At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court granted our client’s. We filed demurrers (motions to dismiss) to all claims on behalf of our client.

#Motion to dismiss defimation dc plus

Plaintiff sought 250,000 in compensatory damages, plus 350,000 in punitive damages. There was no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election, a fact that a range of election officials across the country - and even Trump’s attorney general, William Barr - confirmed. Gentry Locke represented an individual defendant in a multi-count defamation and malicious prosecution case.